Featured Article:

What if the Client does not Read English?

By Mary Cotten

The question of the effectiveness of a waiver signed by a non-reader or a non-English reader is a concern for sport, recreation, and fitness providers.  Courts generally hold that a person who signs a contract is bound by it whether they read it or not.

This was one of the issues before the U. S. District Court in a 2016 New Jersey case, Kang v. LA Fitness.  Kang, who could not read or understand English, joined LA Fitness and signed a membership contract which contained a “RELEASE AND WAIVER OF LIABILITY AND INDEMNITY.”  Her daughter was present to translate for her.  Kang was later injured on a chin/dip assist pull up machine and sued, alleging negligence.  LA Fitness moved for summary judgment on the basis of the waiver signed by Kang.

Kang argued that there was no “mutual assent” since she could not speak English.  The court said that Kang’s “inability to speak English does not bar her from becoming contractually bound.”  They added that New Jersey courts “have unequivocally held that in the absence of fraud, one who signs an agreement is conclusively presumed to understand and assent to its terms and legal effect.”  The fact that the staff may not have explained the waiver terms to her or her daughter did not preclude enforcement.

Kang’s other arguments for not enforcing the waiver were also unpersuasive.  The court upheld the waiver and granted the motion for summary judgment to LA Fitness.

Risk Management takeaway:

A waiver is generally enforced, even if the signer cannot read or has not read it.  However, it would be good practice when presenting the waiver to have staff explain its purpose to a non-reader or, if possible, have someone translate for a non-speaker of English what the patron is signing. This would be good public relations and might prevent a lawsuit in case of injury.

Photo Credit: Thanks to  Stephanie Young Merzel     via Flickr.

Read the Article

Recent Articles:

Enforcement of Health Club Waivers of Liability Challenged by New Jersey Supreme Court Judge

By Doyice Cotten Courts in most states will enforce well-written liability waivers signed willingly by adults. Nevertheless, many people argue strongly against this protection for service providers. This post presents good arguments by one judge opposed to health club immunity from liability granted by such waivers. Current New Jersey case law supports the enforcement of health club liability waivers. In fact, the Supreme Court of New Jersey recently determined to accept a stipulation for dismissal following a settlement of the matter by the parties.... [read more]

Four Common Waiver Formats: Which is Best for Your Business?

By Doyice Cotten Thousands of agreements which waive the liability of sport, recreation, and fitness providers are utilized each day; but not all waivers look alike. There are at least four commonly used formats for liability protection. Each format has advantages and disadvantages — consequently, the formats are not equally effective. In this post, I compare the formats so that the reader may decide if he or she is using the best possible type of liability protection. Common Formats The common formats are 1) the stand-alone waiver of liability,... [read more]

Waiver Fails to Protect Sports club in a Trip and Fall Case

By JoAnn M. Eickhoff-Shemek, Ph.D., FACSM Dr. Eickhoff-Shemek is Professor Emeritus, University of South Florida (USF) and is President of the Fitness Law Academy, LLC (www.fitnesslawacademy.com). This post originally appeared in the Fitness Law Academy Newsletter, Vol 1, Issue 4 (October, 2018). You may subscribe to the quarterly newsletter free of charge at www.fitnesslawacademy.com. Case Brief: Crossing-Lyons v. Towns Sport International,... [read more]

Negligence Standard or Recklessness Standard – Which Standard of Care Applies to Injured Spectator of a Snowmobile Race?

By Doyice Cotten Spectators Tory Baughan and Megan MacNeill were injured while watching a snowmobile “hillclimb” racing event. They were in the designated, but unprotected, spectator area when one of the racers became dismounted from his Polaris snowmobile on his way up the hill. The driverless snowmobile continued to travel back down the hill at a high rate of speed before colliding with plaintiffs. Baughan sued claiming negligence, premises liability, gross negligence, and willful and wanton misconduct (Baughan v.... [read more]

Evaluating a Waiver

By Doyice Cotten   In waiver cases, a court has to determine if the liability waiver does, indeed, protect the defendant from liability for negligence. In this post, we will examine a recent waiver addressed in Garvine v. Maryland, (2018) to see how courts address this task and give the reader a little insight into the sometimes complicated process of evaluation.   Waiver in Question Oxford Feed &... [read more]

Risk Management Procedures Help Save Utah Snowmobile Operator from Liability

By Doyice Cotten Matthew Rose rented a 2014 Polaris snowmobile from Summit Lodge. While approaching an opening in a wooden fence on the snowmobile, the throttle stuck on full-throttle and resulted in an injury to Rose. The snowmobile has a thumb-operated throttle lever for acceleration; release of the lever is supposed to return the machine to idle. Normally, the machine has two methods of manual shut-off: a kill switch or by turning the key to off.... [read more]