Featured Article:

Statute Prohibiting Waivers on Snorkling-type Vessels Upheld

By Doyice Cotten

Mr. and Mrs. Dempsey went on a snorkeling tour in Hawaii. Prior to the trip, they signed liability waivers intended to relieve the tour company of liability for injuries resulting from tour company negligence.

Mrs. Dempsey, after a dive, slipped and fell while walking on deck in flippers. They filed suit alleging negligent instruction and claimed the waiver was unenforceable due to a federal statute.



  1. Federal Maritime Code Provision Regarding Limiting Liability For Personal Injury

46 U.S.C. § 30509 Provisions limiting liability for personal injury or death, (effective October 6, 2006), provides, as follows:

      (a) Prohibitions.—

(1) In general.–The owner, master, manager, or agent of a vessel transporting passengers between ports in the United States, or between a port in the United States and a port in a foreign country, may not include in a regulation or contract a provision limiting

(A) the liability of the owner, master, or agent for personal injury or death caused by the negligence or fault of the owner or the owner’s employees or agents;


(B) the right of a claimant for personal injury or death to a trial by court of competent jurisdiction.

(2) Voidness.–A provision described in paragraph (1) is void.

The plaintiffs claimed the waiver did not apply on such a trip because the vessel did not transport between ports – it transported to and from the same port.  So, the whole case swung on how the court interpreted the language of the statute.

In ruling, the court relied on a similar case, Ehart v. Lahaina Divers Inc., 2022. In Ehart, a husband and wife went on a chartered SCUBA and snorkeling tour that departed from Lahaina Harbor on the island of Maui.  The vessel took the passengers snorkeling near Molokini Crater, and Maureen Ehart disappeared while snorkeling on the tour.  The vessel returned to Lahaina Harbor when Ehart was unable to be located. The Ehart court ruled that “between ports” could mean from and back to the same port. The Dempsey court followed precedent and declared the waiver was unenforceable.

So, the defendant may not rely on the release and waiver of liability signed by Plaintiff Carla Dempsey as a defense at trial. The release is void as a matter of law pursuant to 46 U.S.C. § 30509

OF INTEREST: There have been a number of similar cases involving 46 U.S.C. § 30509… some looking at this same issue. It seems that federal courts have not all agreed on this issue. The legislators who write statutes are not perfect; consequently, legislation they write is often less than perfect as well.

Photo Credit: Thanks to Michael Leonard via Flickr.

Read the Article

Recent Articles:

Big Nebraska Supreme Court Ruling on Waivers

By Doyice Cotten A university soccer player and his mother signed a waiver so he could participate on the intercollegiate soccer team. The student was injured at a mandatory strength workout when an elastic exercise band  came loose from a j hook and struck the player in his eyes. The student and mother sued alleging negligence (a motion to change the claim to gross negligence was denied). The court granted summary judgment based on the waiver.... [read more]

Minnesota Waiver Case Summary Judgment Reversed when Minor Reaches Age of Majority

By Doyice Cotten Justice was 7 years old when he was severely injured (including multiple skull fractures, a brain hemorrhage, a post-traumatic seizure, and a traumatic brain injury) when he fell from an inflatable and struck a carpet-covered concrete floor. His mother had signed a waiver; based on the waiver, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the amusement company Now, Justice, having reached majority age,... [read more]

$46 Million Dollar Award Causes Stir in Martial Arts Community

Jack Greener, a white belt Jiu Jitsu student, suffered a devasting, paralyzing injury while working with his black belt instructor. The injury was suffered in November, 2018 and the award was announced by the trial court on March 38, 2023. The California Superior Court handed down the decision after a long trial. A major issue in the trial was whether the actions of the instructor involved negligence or gross negligence. Two key questions the jury was asked to answer were: “Was [Instructor’s] conduct a substantial factor in causing harm to Jack Greener?”   and “Did [Instructor] unreasonably increase the risk to Jack Greener over and above those inherent in Brazilian Jiu Jitsu sparring?” The jury answered yes to both questions.... [read more]

Unsupervised Childcare Costs Club’s Parent Company $13 Million

This article appeared in the Jan/Feb 2023 issue of Athletic Business. Attorney John Wolohan ([email protected]) is a professor of sports law in the David B. Falk College for Sport and Human Dynamics at Syracuse University, where Beth Perez is a Ph.D. student in Higher Education. Anyone who offers childcare in a fitness setting should pay special attention to this article. The reader should also note that there is no mention of a liability waiver in the article so one can only suppose that there was no waiver required.... [read more]

Hey!!! A Free Webinar: Learn More About Fitness Law

  By JoAnn Eickhoff-Shemek Teaching Fitness Law – FREE Webinar May 4th The Fitness Law Academy, LLC is again offering a Faculty Training Course this summer (begins May 23rd). Faculty members who have participated in this course the past two summers have enjoyed and benefited from the course. Many of them are now including legal/risk management content in an existing academic course or have developed an entire legal/risk management course which they are now teaching.... [read more]

Enforceability and Ambiguity at Issue in Kentucky Horseback Riding Waiver

By Doyice Cotten Ms. Sylvia Rieff and her two children visited Jesse James Riding Stables, Inc. (JJStables) and took a guided horseback riding tour. Approximately 20 minutes into the tour, as the trail entered the surrounding woods, Ms. Rieff’s saddle became loose, and she slid off the side of the horse, falling to the ground. Ms. Rieff sued JJStables alleging they were negligent in adjusting the saddle (Rieff v. Jesse James Riding Stables, Inc.,... [read more]