Featured Article:

Developing a ‘Safety Training Grid’

Ian McGregor, Ph.D.
President, McGregor & Associates

I am pleased to be able to bring you this article by Ian McGregor, a well-known leader, professional, and consultant in the Risk Management field. Dr. McGregor is a true expert in the field. Here Ian tackles a real problem facing sport, recreation, and fitness managers — training employees.  For more information, Dr. McGregor can be contacted at [email protected]. We are pleased that we will be able to occasionally post more risk management articles from SportRisk, his risk management newsletter. Doyice

Training employees in various safety protocols is a critical part of any department’s risk management plan. The challenges are numerous:

  • Significant number of part-time student employees
  • High turnover of employees
  • Significant number of training protocols to cover
  • Consistency of training between program units

Some departments adopt a ‘centralized’ approach to safety training i.e. all ‘essential’ training is coordinated centrally, usually through one person or a training committee (with individual program units responsible for any training specific to their program e.g. aquatics ‘in-service’ training). Other departments require each functional unit to be responsible for their own training (which potentially results in inconsistencies within the department unless someone is monitoring or tracking overall training efforts).

Irrespective of the approach, it is important that safety training be coordinated and monitored. The creation of a ‘Safety Training Grid’ provides a simple yet concrete way of ensuring that the right people are trained, and that this is training is being effectively tracked and monitored.

Where do you start? How do you keep track?

It is recommended that one person in the department be assigned as the ‘Department Training Coordinator’. (Alternatively, this role can be assumed by the Director or the Risk Management Committee).

The following describes a three-step process for the Training Coordinator to follow in developing a comprehensive (and practical) training program, and a simple tracking system to monitor it:
Step 1: Determine ‘Who needs training in What’

Step 2: Develop ‘Unit Training Grids’

Step 3: Develop a ‘Department Training Grid’.

 

Step 1: Who needs training in What?

 What Types of Training?
Start by identifying all the safety training programs being currently delivered (or being added in the future). Typical safety training programs include:

1st Aid/ CPR
AED
Blood pathogens
Disease control (e.g. MRSA)
Evacuation/ Fire/ Severe Weather emergencies
Medical Emergency Response
Risk management awareness
Other (e.g. WHMIS training)

Who Needs Training?
Not everyone in the department needs to be trained in everything!

Training everyone (including part-time students) is just not practical — or reasonable. Determining who needs training requires a common-sense approach which balances practicality with necessity. For example, in the Intramural program, does it make sense to train all referees in all sports in all the protocols listed above? Probably not — and a more reasonable approach might be to train all Intramural supervisors in selected protocols (assuming referees report to supervisors).

The key factors to be reviewed when answering the ‘Who’ question are:
*The type of activity involved (high risk vs. low risk)
*The practicality and logistics of each situation

Higher risk programs may require (from a common-sense viewpoint) that more people are trained in more safety protocols. Also, it may not be practical or efficient to train a large number of part-time students (e.g. referees) in a specific protocol (e.g. AED training) in situations where highly trained personnel are close by (e.g. for Intramural basketball games when trained permanent staff are in the building). Each activity and situation needs to be looked at separately!

A good starting point for the Training Coordinator is to ask each functional unit manager to divide programs, activities, people and facilities into ‘high risk’ and ‘low-risk’ categories (refer to the ‘Supervision’ article in this issue of the Newsletter). The following chart illustrates this approach for Intramurals:

Higher Risk                                                 Lower Risk
Tackle Rugby (higher risk of injury)                    Volleyball
Ice Hockey (higher risk of injury)                        Table Tennis
Flag Football (lower risk but off-site)                  Ultimate Frisbee

Step 2: Develop ‘Unit Training Grids’

Using the chart developed in Step 1 as the starting point, each unit manager is now ready to develop a ‘Training Grid’ specific to their unit. Hence Step 2 involves unit managers reviewing each ‘high-risk’/‘low-risk’ program and determining which staff needs to be trained in which protocol.

Here’s what a typical ‘Training Grid’ might look like for Intramural staff. (Note that this Grid is used for illustration purposes and the ‘Training Required’ is an example only. Each university should develop Unit Grids based on their own unique situation and requirements):

Unit Training Grid

Employee                                    Training Required                     Training Timing
Program Supervisors                                1-7                                           August
Referees in Ice Hockey, Rugby               1, 3, 5, 7                            September/ January
All other Referees                                   5, 6, 7                              September/ January

1st Aid/ CPR
2. AED
3. Blood pathogens
4. Disease control
5. Evacuation/ Fire/ Severe Weather Emergencies
6. Medical Emergency Response
7. Risk management awareness
8. Missing Persons
9. In-service

(Note: Unit Managers can expand this Training Grid to include ‘Certification Requirements’ i.e. documenting any specific qualifications or certifications required for certain positions.)

Step 3: Develop ‘Department Training Grid’

After unit managers have submitted their Unit Training Grids, the Training Coordinator can then assemble the global ‘Department Training Gird’. (The following Grid is shown for illustration purposes only – universities need to determine their own Grid and requirements.)

Department Training Grid

Unit                   Employee                       Training Required        When
Intramurals       Program Supervisors                    1-7, 9                    August
Intramurals       Hockey Refs                                1, 3, 5, 7                September/ Jan
Intramurals       All other Referees                          5, 6                      September/ Jan

Fitness               Aerobics Instructors                1, 3, 5, 6, 9               September
Fitness               Personal Trainers                     1, 3, 6, 9                  September
Fitness               Yoga Instructors                         1, 6                       September

Summer Camps  Head Camp Instructor                 1-8                       May/ June
Summer Camps   Camp Counselors                     6, 7, 8                    June

Sport Clubs        Coaches                                   1-3, 6                      September
Sport Clubs        Club Officers                             1-3, 6                      September

Aquatics             Head Lifeguard                            3-9                      Sept/ Jan/ June
Aquatics             Guards                                       3-9                      Sept/ Jan/ June

****************************

 

Role of the Training Coordinator

The Training Coordinator has six main responsibilities:

1.         Ensures that all functional units within the department develop ‘Unit Grids’ which include training protocols unique to each unit.
2.         Assembles the ‘Department Training Grid’.
3.         Determines which training protocols are best delivered ‘globally’ and which are best delivered by each specific unit.
4.         Determines who does the Training (internally through department or university staff, or using outside contractors [e.g. Red Cross]).
5.         Monitors all safety training.
6.         Requires Unit Managers to submit lists detailing which staff have completed the required unit training.

Safety Training should be a high priority for all departments, and it is important that unit managers carefully review their training needs, and develop a training plan that is based on a common-sense approach which addresses priorities. The three-step approach described in this article creates a Department Training Grid which consolidates all unit plans and facilitates the effective coordination and monitoring of all training efforts.

Photo Credit: Thanks to Fort Rucker via Flickr.

Read the Article

Recent Articles:

Illinois Waiver Law: The Importance of the Language that Defines the Scope of a Waiver

By Doyice J. Cotten Patricia Cizek visited the North Wall Rock Climbing Gym to attempt some bouldering. She fell or dropped from the wall and landed with one foot on the mat and one off; she broke her ankle. It was her first day of bouldering. She sued alleging negligence as well as willful and wanton conduct (Cizek v. North Wall, Inc., 2018). Even as a beginner, she understood that rock climbing involved being at a height higher than the ground.... [read more]

Snow Tubing Case Helps to Clarify the Tough Maine Waiver Law

By Doyice Cotten  Karrol Leadbetter went snow tubing at Family Fun Management, a Maine amusement center. She suffered an injury and sued the center alleging negligence, gross negligence, and recklessness (Leadbetter v. Family Fun Mgmt, 2018). The snow tube course consists of a number of parallel snow-covered tracks divided by man-made berms of snow. At the bottom of the tracks is a common runout area with a man-made pile of snow, which acts as a retaining wall to slow snow tubers at the end of their runs.... [read more]

Bicycle Racer Killed in Collision with Support Vehicle Parked in the Traffic Lane

By Doyice Cotten Suzanne Rivera competed in a bicycling race organized by Velo Promo, LLC and USA Cycling, Inc. During the race, she struck a support van  parked in the lane of the road designated for the cyclists on a downhill, curved section of the course. She was killed. The heirs sued defendants Velo Promo, USA Cycling and Richard Ciccarelli (the driver of the support van) alleging negligence (and gross negligence).(Rivera v. Velo Promo,... [read more]

Waiver Not Against Public Policy in Pennsylvania Health Club Slip & Fall Incident

By Doyice Cotten Dolores Vinson, a member of LA Fitness, slipped and fell when she stepped on a wet mat. She sued the club for negligence in their maintenance (Vinson v. Fitness & Sports Clubs, LLC, 2018). The club claimed protection based on a liability waiver in the membership agreement. The trial court granted the LA Fitness motion for summary judgment. Pennsylvania Law The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has named three conditions that must be met for a waiver to be enforceable.... [read more]

Does Your Waiver Make any Promises to Your Clients?

By Doyice Cotten It is not uncommon in liability waivers for the writer to include such language as a promise of safety, an effort to make the activity safe, a promise of safe equipment, an assurance of good supervision, and/or assertion of well-trained staff or instructors.  However, as you will learn in this post, this is not a very good idea. While this case deals only with Alaska waiver law, the inclusion of such promises in your waiver  might bear reconsideration.... [read more]

How Long does a Waiver Last?

  By Doyice Cotten In a 2018 New Jersey waiver case (Weed v Sky N.J., LLC, 2018 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 410), the primary issue revolved around the enforceability of an arbitration agreement included in the liability waiver. There were two important questions addressed. First, what is the duration of a waiver (and the arbitration agreement)? And second, who can sign a waiver on behalf of a minor. Under New Jersey law, it is well established that parental waivers (a waiver signed on behalf of a minor by a parent or a legal guardian) are unenforceable.... [read more]