Featured Article:

Multiple Waivers and Multiple Business Names Cloud A Trail Ride Case

By Doyice Cotten

Brenda Martz-Alvarado was injured when dismounting from a trail ride. She sued the property owner, Tomi Truaz, and the owners of the trailride, Forrest and Georgia Riddle (dba Grand View Horse Tours).

Truaz was running a business at the property operating under the name Grand View Horse Tours. Martz-Alvarado purchased a trail-riding experience through a third party website and as part of securing her reservation, she agreed to a waiver of liability.

that being around horses is inherently dangerous” and that she would assume all risks. She also explicitly agreed to waive any claims against “owners, officers, staff members, volunteers, affiliated organizations, land owners, and agents for any injury or death” stemming from horseback riding. The waiver identified the business’ name as Las Vegas Trail Riding.

At a later date she went to the Henderson property for her trail ride and was required to sign another waiver of liability.

This waiver form provided that Martz-Alvarado was “giving up certain legal rights, including the right to sue or recover damages in case of injury, death or property damages, for any reason, including but not limited to, the negligence of the stable, its owner, employees and agents [of] ‘Vegas Horse Tours.’ ” Furthermore, this waiver form included another provision stating, “WARNING: Under NEVADA STATE law an equine professional and equine activity sponsor is not liable for any injury to or death of a participant in equine activities resulting from the inherent risks of equine activities.”

She alleged liability based on several claims. Both the Riddles and Truax moved for summary judgment based on the waivers. The motions were granted.

Appeal

On appeal, Martz-Alvarado made several arguments.

First, she pointed out that the waiver listed the business name as Las Vegas Trail Riding while the business operated as Grand View Horse Tours. The court pointed out that “An individual doing business as a sole proprietor, even when business is done under a different name, remains personally liable.” The court held that Truax was the sole proprietor responsible for the businesses, thus there was no ambiguity.

Second, she argued that parties cannot contract out of their negligence. The court disagreed stating that waivers are “generally regarded as a valid exercise of the freedom of contract” in Nevada.  It went on to add that the Nevada Supreme Court upheld a waiver contract in Waldschmidt v. Edge Fitness, 2018, (reported in Sportwaiver.com last week).

In addition, plaintiff made claims of fraud, but produced no evidence of it. She said the waiver did not mention or include the platform, but the court pointed out that one of the waivers referred to the use of equipment. And she claimed the waiver violated public policy, but failed to name the public policy.

Ruling

The appellate court ruled in favor of the defendants affirming the trial court grant of summary judgment.

Risk Management Takeaway

Two potential problems did not prove fatal to the defendants. First, having two waivers can be problematic and could have caused ambiguity resulting in the waivers not being enforced. Stick with one waiver. Second, there should be consistency in the name of the business. Had the business not been a sole proprietorship, this discrepancy could have been fatal.

 

Photo Credit: Thanks to Wesley Fryer  via Flickr.

Read the Article

Recent Articles:

Nevada Supreme Court Rules on Waiver in a Gym Membership Agreement

By Doyice Cotten Nathan Waldschmidt was injured while using the Edge Fitness facilities and filed suit challenging the waiver he had signed previously. He claimed the waiver was ambiguous.  In 2018 the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that the waiver signed by the plaintiff was enforceable (Waldschmidt v. Edge Fitness, LLC, 2018). [Neither details of the incident nor the complete waiver was reported.] The Nevada Supreme Court upheld the summary judgment of the lower court stating that the waiver located in the gym membership contract was unambiguous.   ... [read more]

The #1 Thing to Check in Your Waiver!

By Doyice Cotten Contrary to some opinions, All Waivers Are Not Born Equal. Waivers range in length from one sentence to several pages. Some are written specifically for one particular business while others are generic and intended to be used in many situations. Some are written in legalese; others written in plain language. And some provide more types of protection than others. While waivers may vary in length, specificity, and verbiage, one of the most important determinants of whether the waiver will protect the activity provider is one or two sentences comprising what is called the exculpatory language.... [read more]

Do Waivers Protect when the Injured Party has a Disability?

By Doyice Cotten Sometimes activity providers are reluctant to offer activities to participants with disabilities because they fear possible injury and have doubt as to whether their liability waiver would be enforceable against a person with a disability. The following is a case that is more than 20 years old, but that accurately illustrates that there is no “special waiver law” for the disabled. Franklin Potter, a skilled and experienced handicapped skier, was injured in the National Handicapped Downhill Championships race.... [read more]

Waiver in a Maritime Case due to Boat Collision fails: It did not Specify whose negligence was Protected

By Doyice Cotten Steven Gilliam and Calvin Sanders chartered a boat from New Pelican Charters, LLC and both plaintiffs suffered back injuries when, seeing that the boat was about to collide with another fishing boat, tried to quickly move to a safer part of the boat. The collision occurred, in part, because the steering mechanism was faulty. They filed a maritime law claim alleging negligence in that the boat was not seaworthy (New Pelican Charters v.... [read more]

Personal Trainer and Health Club in Illinois Survive a Claim of performing a Chiropractic Procedure

By Doyice Cotten Gabriella Sosa-Gaines filed a negligence action against Capital Fitness and her personal trainer, Don Myles claiming injuries caused when the trainer pressed down in the area of her spine to relieve her discomfort during a training session (Sosa-Gaines v. Capital Fitness, Inc., 2019). She alleged the action was  a negligent “chiropractive type of adjustment maneuver.” She had previously signed a membership agreement and a personal training agreement, each of which contained a waiver of liability. ... [read more]

Two-Year-Old Loses Toe on a Slide

  By Doyice Cotten In 2018, two-year-old girl lost her little toe while sliding down a sliding board into a splash pad at Buzzards Bay Park in Bourne, MA. At the time she went down the slide, there was a vertical crack about a foot long in the slide. The toe caught in the crack and was sliced off.  [A splash pad  is a recreation area, often in a public park, for water play that has little or no standing water.] The girl,... [read more]