Featured Article:

Triathlon Contract Specifying “No Refunds” Upheld in Florida Court

By Doyice Cotten

Mikaela Ellenwood and Jorge Casanova sued World Triathlon Corporation, Competitor Group Holdings, Incorporated, and Competitor Group, Inc. for failing to provide refunds for the Rock ‘n’ Roll Marathon Series races and Ironman events that were scheduled to take place in 2020 but were postponed or cancelled due to the global Covid-19 pandemic. They claim breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violation of the  Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. (Ellenwood v. World Triathlon Corporation, Florida, 2021)

Ellenwood paid $89 plus $14.99 processing fee when registering for a running event in San Francisco and Casanova paid $399.60 plus a $29.60 processing fee for an Ironman Triathlon running event in Santa Rosa, California. The government mandated cancellation of the events due to the COVID 19 pandemic. The defendants offered the opportunity to transfer the registrations to future comparable races, but refused to refund the money itself.

The court stated that summary judgment is appropriate if the moving party shows there is no disputed material fact and meets the burden of showing that there are no genuine issues of material fact. It further stated that the contracts at issue will be governed by Florida substantive law — which states “the construction and interpretation of an unambiguous written contract is a matter of law for the court and is therefore properly subject to disposition by summary judgment.”

After examining the contracts, the court stated both contracts clearly and unambiguously state that there will be “no refunds.” It pointed out that the contract stated “there will be no refund of the Operator’s entry fee or any costs incurred in connection with the Event.” The court stated “This is a very simple case. ‘No Refunds’ means exactly what it says — no refunds.”

Plaintiffs argued no mutuality, unconscionability, unjust enrichment, and deceptive/unfair practices — all to no effect. So the court upheld summary judgment in favor of the defendants.

Note: If was unclear whether the “no refund” language was in the registration documents and agreement or in the the liability waiver. But this was not important because the result would likely have been the same.

Risk Management Note

The key to the case — and it implies especially to waivers of liability — is that the contract contained clear and unambiguous language.

Photo Credit: thanks to Jimmy Harris via Flickr.

 

Read the Article

Recent Articles:

Legal Technicality Causes New York Acrobatics Instructional Waiver to Fail to Protect

By Doyice Cotten Shana Guins, a 32 years-old woman who stood 5′ 3″ in height and weighed 180 pounds, was injured  and rendered a quadriplegic during an acrobatics class. She was asked to bounce on a mini-trampoline and land with a forward roll. She had been given instruction and had previously performed the task successfully. Defendant pointed out that she made statements to the medical staff after the accident that she was tired after a previous class and after a night of hard drinking.... [read more]

What if a Minor Lies about His Age? Is the Waiver enforceable?

By Doyice Cotten Service providers often ask “Is my waiver still enforceable if a minor lies about his age and signs the waiver?” The answer probably varies considerably depending upon where the incident happens. Remember, waiver law is state law and the law is not the same everywhere. A recent Georgia court provided some evidence regarding the answer to this question – at least for service providers in Georgia. Adventure Air Sports Kennesaw, LLC (AASK) requires that all participants sign a waiver of liability and minor participants must have his or her parents sign the waiver.... [read more]

Riding a Mechanical Bull after much “Socializing” Might Not be the Best Idea!

Doyice Cotten Joseph Kuchta, while socializing with friends at Gilley’s Nightclub in Sparks, Nevada, observed the operation of a mechanical bull. He expressed interest in a gentle ride like the ones he had observed, termed a 2 out of a possible 10 in roughness. The employee demonstrated how easy a slow ride was and Kuchta agreed to do it. He was required to sign a liability waiver which stated the potential risks and possible injuries involved in riding the bull,... [read more]

Things That Get Exercise Professionals into Trouble!

Things That Get Exercise Professionals into Trouble!              Exercise professionals sometimes find themselves in legal trouble when they attempt to do things they are not qualified or licensed to do. Following the advice of Dr Eickhoff-Shemek can help exercise professionals stay in the gym and out of the courtroom. Take time now to subscribe to her free quarterly newsletter at www.fitnesslawacademy.com.       Exercise Professionals: Distinguishing “Legal” and “Professional” Scope of Practice By JoAnn M.... [read more]

Announcement

For the next few weeks, Sportwaiver.com’s weekly post may not appear each week. My wife, and partner in life, succumbed to lymphoma. She played a major role in the website and all my publications, whether they carried her name or not. Because I know many of you knew Mary, I am posting just a part of her obituary including a photo that I took on a trip to Malaysia about three years ago. I am not sure when the next post will appear,... [read more]

Help in Recognizing Ambiguity in Your Waiver

By Doyice Cotten Ambiguity is one of the most prevalent claims when challenging the enforceability of liability waivers. This post involves a case in which a waiver is claimed to be ambiguous. We focus on the arguments by the plaintiff and the reasoning of the court in addressing the issue. Jodi Sheldon suffered serious injury while participating in a high ropes course at the Golden Bell Ranch in Colorado. She sued claiming negligence naming Golden Bell,... [read more]