Featured Article:

What if a Minor Lies about His Age? Is the Waiver enforceable?

By Doyice Cotten

Service providers often ask “Is my waiver still enforceable if a minor lies about his age and signs the waiver?” The answer probably varies considerably depending upon where the incident happens. Remember, waiver law is state law and the law is not the same everywhere. A recent Georgia court provided some evidence regarding the answer to this question – at least for service providers in Georgia.

Adventure Air Sports Kennesaw, LLC (AASK) requires that all participants sign a waiver of liability and minor participants must have his or her parents sign the waiver. If the parent is not with the minor, an employee checks the database to see if the parent has signed a waiver previously. Noah Smith, age 17, executed the waiver in his father’s name without parental consent or knowledge. The employee viewed the father’s driver’s license and surprisingly marked the signature valid. When Noah performed a maneuver on the trampoline, he suffered a spinal cord injury resulting in paralysis.

The trial court granted summary judgment to AASK based on the liability waiver and the plaintiffs appealed (Smith v.Adventure Air Sports Kennesaw, LLC, 2020.

The Smiths argued that the contract is unenforceable because it was executed by a minor. The court disagreed. It stated that generally “the contract of a minor is voidable,” but pointed out that minors may be estopped (barred due to previous actions) “from voiding contracts when those agreements are induced by fraud and deceit, such as when a false representation is made by a minor as to the minor’s age.” The court explained that it saw no real difference between “fraud and deceit” and lying about one’s age. It added that estoppels do not usually apply with minors except when the act is made to deceive of fraud.

The court went on to say that the key question was “whether the minor has arrived at those years of discretion when a fraudulent intent could be reasonably imputed to him.” In other words, did Noah have the “capacity for conceiving or executing a fraudulent intent.” Once the minor has that capacity, the minor can be held responsible for the act. When this is the case – the minor had capacity – it relieves the service provider of the duty to investigate the veracity of the signer’s age. The exception would be if there is some evidence that might cast suspicion on the truthfulness of the representation by the minor.

Interestingly, in Georgia, one may be found guilty of a crime as early as age 13. For civil liability, “infancy is no defense to a tort action so long as the defendant has reached the age of discretion and accountability….”

The plaintiffs argued that the defendant was not diligent in verifying Noah’s age. The court stated that at age 17, Noah certainly had the capacity to conceive and execute a fraudulent intent – thus the trial court did not err in ruling that he could not void the contract due to minor status.


The court upheld the minor’s signature and ruled in favor of AASK. So the waiver of liability by the minor was enforced in this Georgia case. This, however, does not mean all waivers by minors may be enforced! SUPPOSE: Another 17 year-old goes to AASK, looks at the waiver, signs his own name, shows his driver’s license, and the employee does not bother to notice he is a minor. When he suffers injury, what does Georgia law say?

Photo Credit: Thanks to Visit Grand Forks – Northern Air Family Fun Center  

Read the Article

Recent Articles:

Riding a Mechanical Bull after much “Socializing” Might Not be the Best Idea!

Doyice Cotten Joseph Kuchta, while socializing with friends at Gilley’s Nightclub in Sparks, Nevada, observed the operation of a mechanical bull. He expressed interest in a gentle ride like the ones he had observed, termed a 2 out of a possible 10 in roughness. The employee demonstrated how easy a slow ride was and Kuchta agreed to do it. He was required to sign a liability waiver which stated the potential risks and possible injuries involved in riding the bull,... [read more]

Things That Get Exercise Professionals into Trouble!

Things That Get Exercise Professionals into Trouble!              Exercise professionals sometimes find themselves in legal trouble when they attempt to do things they are not qualified or licensed to do. Following the advice of Dr Eickhoff-Shemek can help exercise professionals stay in the gym and out of the courtroom. Take time now to subscribe to her free quarterly newsletter at www.fitnesslawacademy.com.       Exercise Professionals: Distinguishing “Legal” and “Professional” Scope of Practice By JoAnn M.... [read more]


For the next few weeks, Sportwaiver.com’s weekly post may not appear each week. My wife, and partner in life, succumbed to lymphoma. She played a major role in the website and all my publications, whether they carried her name or not. Because I know many of you knew Mary, I am posting just a part of her obituary including a photo that I took on a trip to Malaysia about three years ago. I am not sure when the next post will appear,... [read more]

Help in Recognizing Ambiguity in Your Waiver

By Doyice Cotten Ambiguity is one of the most prevalent claims when challenging the enforceability of liability waivers. This post involves a case in which a waiver is claimed to be ambiguous. We focus on the arguments by the plaintiff and the reasoning of the court in addressing the issue. Jodi Sheldon suffered serious injury while participating in a high ropes course at the Golden Bell Ranch in Colorado. She sued claiming negligence naming Golden Bell,... [read more]

Flag Football Waiver Effectiveness Depends on GOL 5-326 Ruling: Was a Fee Paid?

Marc injured his left foot in October, 2015, while playing in a League flag football game (Marc v Middle Country Ctr. Sch. Dist. 2017 NY Slip Op 51678(U)). He jumped to catch a pass, came down on a concealed sprinkler head, and suffered injury. He sued the school district since the league game was played on school district property. Prior to the game, he and the other team members had signed waivers intended to protect the school district from liability.  ... [read more]

Georgia Recreational Property Act Protects

By Doyice Cotten Last week’s post, Waiver Protects Cheerleader Organization from Liability for Negligence in Georgia, examined the effect of a waiver on the liability of Georgia All Stars (GA). The court also said that GA was protected by the Georgia Recreational Property Act (OCGA § 51-3-20 et seq.). In this post, we will examine the latter source of liability protection for some recreation providers. To review, Kimberly Shields sued RDM, LLC d/b/a Georgia All Stars for negligence when Kimberly tripped and fell from mats on the floor at an exhibition of participants’ routines for parents to view in the practice area of the gym.... [read more]