Featured Article:

Another Injury Outside a Fitness Facility – Different Result

By Doyice Cotten

2896534946_d83dac7350_b-150x150.jpgIn the last post (You Be the Judge – Test your Liability Knowledge) a suit resulted from an injury when a woman slipped and fell on the icy sidewalk outside a health club. This post involves an injury caused by a fall on an uneven or cracked sidewalk about twenty feet from the entrance to a YMCA (Gibson v. Young Men’s Christian Association of Middle Tennessee, 2016).

The client had signed a waiver when she joined the YMCA. The pertinent part of the waiver read:

In consideration of gaining membership and/or being allowed to participate in the activities and programs of the YMCA of Middle Tennessee (“YMCA”) and to use its facilities (whether owned or leased), equipment and machinery, I do hereby waive, release and forever discharge the YMCA and its officers, agents, employees, volunteers, representatives, directors and all others from any and all responsibility or liability for injuries or damages resulting from participation in such activities or programs or my use of such facilities, equipment or machinery, even if such damage or injury results from a negligent act or omission.[Bold added.]

Gibson filed suit alleging negligence; she argued that the waiver applied only to activities within the facility and the use of the equipment and the facility. The YMCA claimed protection based on the waiver. The trial court, after hearing the arguments, held that “in entering the facilities was in fact using the facilities” and was contemplated by the parties in signing the waiver.

The appellate court stated that “Exculpatory agreements, such as the one signed by Appellee, have long been enforceable in Tennessee.” It said that court are to look to the plain meaning of the words in the document to determine the intent of the parties. It pointed out that the trial court did not find the waiver to be ambiguous. It went on to say that the agreement signed by Gibson released YMCA from liability for any and all injuries resulting from her participation in YMCA activities or programs or her “use of [YMCA] facilities, equipment or machinery, even if such damage or injury results from a negligent act or omission.”

It explained that it is immaterial whether Gibson contemplated tripping and falling on a sidewalk in front of the YMCA when she signed the waiver because the waiver is not ambiguous. The court upheld the trial court summary judgment ruling in favor of the YMCA.

Suggestion to the Reader

Look at the waiver in last week’s post again. You will see that the waivers are not significantly different, yet result different rulings. In this writer’s opinion, neither waiver was well-written and both were ambiguous because neither makes it clear whether the sidewalk is covered by the waiver. In many, or even most states, neither waiver would be enforced.

The expense and hassle of the lawsuit could have been avoided in each case had the waiver been drafted more explicitly. It would be wise to make a simple change such as adding the italicized language in the exculpatory sentence:

… from any and all responsibility or liability for injuries or damages resulting from participation in such activities, programs, equipment, machinery, and my use of such facilities (including sidewalks, parking lots, restrooms, showers, locker rooms, and hallways), ….

Your waiver is an important part of your risk management program. You need a waiver that is carefully drafted by someone who is has experience in writing waivers for recreation and sport businesses. This YMCA got away with a poor waiver – but, Tennessee is what you might call a lenient state when it comes to enforcing waivers. Most states have requirements that are much more demanding.

Read the Article

Recent Articles:

You Be the Judge – Test your Liability Knowledge

By Doyice Cotten Occasionally, we offer the reader an opportunity to test his or her liability judgment. Take a few minutes and check this waiver and see if you think it protected the defendant health club from liability for negligence (Hoffner v. Fitness Xpress, 2016). Situation Charlotte Hoffner had been a member of Fitness Xpress, a health club in Michigan, for about two weeks when she slipped and fell on ice on the sidewalk in front of the club.... [read more]

Massachusetts Skydiving Waiver Case Yields Some Interesting Results Regarding: Opportunity to Bargain, Unconscionability, & Strict Liability

By Doyice Cotten Tricia Cahalane was seriously injured while performing a tandem skydiving activity. In the tandem skydive, she was attached to Marcus Silva, an employee, by a harness. During the skydive, Silva performed a “hook turn;”  Hook turns were allowed at that time, but have since been prohibited. When she landed, she broke the femur in each leg. Prior to the skydive, she signed a waiver releasing Skydive Cape Cod from liability for any injury incurred. She was given the opportunity to avoid signing the waiver for an additional fee of $750,... [read more]

Delaware Court Enforces Motocross Parental Waiver for Negligence but Not for Recklessness

By Doyice Cotten   In 2013, Tommy Lynam (age 13), was riding a motocross bicycle at Blue Diamond Motocross near New Castle. While riding, Tommy rode off a jump, made a hard landing, and was unable to stop in time before colliding with a large metal shipping container. Lynam sued alleging negligence and recklessness (Lynam v. Blue Diamond Motocross LLC, 2016).   Lynam’s father had signed a waiver entitled “Parental Consent, Release and Waiver of Liability,... [read more]

Admiralty Law Supports Liability Waiver in New Jersey Parasail Case

By Doyice Cotten The Olmos and their two sons signed up for a parasailing trip. While on the boat traveling out of the inlet, Dina Olmo shifted her sitting position just as the boat hit a wave, lifting her into the air. When she landed she felt “a stabbing pain at the bottom of [her] back.”The boat immediately returned to the dock and she was taken to the hospital. The two sons remained to continue with their parasailing trip.... [read more]

Florida Waiver Law for Minors

By Doyice Cotten The Florida Supreme Court (Kirton v. Fields, 2008) has ruled that parental waivers designed to protect commercial entities from liability for negligence are not enforceable. Florida appellate courts, however, have enforced parental waivers when used by schools or recreational entities (Krathen v. School Board of Monroe Country, Fla., 2007; Gonzalez v. City of Coral Gables, 2004). In 2013, the Florida Legislature passed F.S.... [read more]

Test Yourself: Analyze this Waiver Case and Predict Whether the Waiver Protects

By Doyice Cotten Plaintiff Asabi L. Barner Jackson (Jackson), who lives in South Carolina, chose to have Black Ink apply a tattoo, based upon a reality TV series in which Black Ink allegedly represented itself to specialize and be experts in tattooing African American skin (Jackson v. Black Ink Tattoo Studio, Inc., 2016). Jackson claims that she has permanent injury to her left breast. She says there is “deep tissue damage and a very large,... [read more]