Featured Article:

WAIVERS FOR MINOR PARTICIPANTS: States with Likely Enforcement of Commercial and Non-Profit Entities — Part VI

By Doyice Cotten

9523560519_187eb17629_zThis is the sixth of an eight-part series on the enforceability of liability waivers of negligence when the sport or recreation participant is a minor.

Three states will be discussed in this post. Courts in each state enforce parental waivers utilized by both commercial and  non-profit entities. In the seventh post next week, three more states will be addressed. Parental waivers are likely to be enforced in each.

California

California was the first state in which the courts enforced a parental waiver. The landmark case was Hohe v. San Diego School District (1990). Since that time, California courts have enforced parental waivers numerous times – far more than any other state. They make no distinction between commercial and non-profit entities.

Ohio

Ohio was the first state in which the state Supreme Court issued a strong ruling examining the issues in detail (Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, 1998). This influential case has been cited in many jurisdictions. The court endorsed the right of a parent to raise his or child and held that parents have the authority to bind their minor children to agreements with sponsors of non-profit activities. This has since been expanded to apply to commercial entities as well.

Maryland

The Court of Appeals of Maryland (Maryland’s highest court) has stated that the General Assembly has passed statutes that empower parents to exercise authority on behalf of their minor children on the most important aspects of the child’s life – education, medical treatment, immunizations, and religion. The court then deferred to a parent’s determination that the potential risks of a recreational activity are outweighed by the possible benefit to the child and did not involve the public interest. For those and other reasons, the court enforced the parental waiver used by the commercial entity in BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. v. Rosen (2013).

Since the court endorses the enforcement of a waiver protecting a commercial entity, it seems reasonable to expect that they would also enforce a parental waiver for a non-profit entity.

The seventh post in the series in January will present three states in which courts have ruled that parental waivers utilized by either commercial entities or both non-profit and commercial entities are enforceable.

Photo Credit: Thanks to Verse Photography in Flickr.

Read the Article

Recent Articles:

WAIVERS FOR MINOR PARTICIPANTS: States Enforcing Only School-Community Recreation Waivers — Part V

  By Doyice Cotten This is the fifth of an eight-part series on the enforceability of liability waivers of negligence when the sport or recreation participant is a minor. As discussed in a previous post, some states distinguish parental waivers utilized by commercial entities from parental waivers relied upon by schools and community recreation entities. Florida Florida, too, was mentioned in an earlier post in regard to F.S. 744.301 [2017] which established the enforceability of parental waivers of the inherent risks of the activity;... [read more]

WAIVERS FOR MINOR PARTICIPANTS: Enforced in the Past but Unlikely in the Future — Part IV

  By Doyice Cotten This is the fourth of an eight-part series on the enforceability of liability waivers of negligence when the sport or recreation participant is a minor. Parental waiver law in three states will be addressed in this post. Parental waivers have been enforced by appellate courts on several occasions in the past in two of the states (Connecticut and Wisconsin) and by a U.S. District Court in New York.... [read more]

WAIVERS FOR MINOR PARTICIPANTS: Broad Statutes Relating to Enforcement of Parental Waivers — Part III

  By Doyice Cotten This is the third of an eight-part series on the enforceability of liability waivers of negligence when the sport or recreation participant is a minor.   Statutes Allowing Parental Waivers for Negligence Three states have statutes that specifically state that parental waivers are enforceable under certain circumstances. These are Alaska, Colorado, and Minnesota. Alaska A.S. 09.65-292 [2012] provides the following: (a) Except as provided in (b) of this section,... [read more]
minor b

WAIVERS FOR MINOR PARTICIPANTS: States Yielding Insufficient Enforcement Information — Part II

By Doyice Cotten This is the second of an eight-part series on the enforceability of liability waivers of negligence when the sport or recreation participant is a minor.   In Part I of this series, states in which court rulings, public policy, or statute forbid the enforcement of parental waivers were listed. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to confidently predict whether courts in a state will enforce such waivers. There are seventeen states from which there is insufficient information from caselaw to forecast the way in which courts might rule.... [read more]
Minor a

WAIVERS FOR MINOR PARTICIPANTS: Statutes Relating to Particular Activities — Part I

  By Doyice Cotten This is the first of an eight-part series on the enforceability of liability waivers of negligence when the sport or recreation participant is a minor.  It is well-established that a liability waiver will protect sport, recreation, and fitness providers from liability for injury resulting from provider negligence in almost every state when the waiver is well-written, properly administered, and voluntarily signed by an adult participant. Many providers,... [read more]
A morning at the Carolina Panther's Training Camp at Wofford College in Spartanburg, S.C. on 8/10/2009

Football Drill Death Illustrates the Need for Better Risk Management

By Doyice Cotten Mileto and dozens of other players were taking part in a summer football camp on school grounds that was run by the Sachem East coaches and funded by a boosters group, the Sachem East Touchdown Club. The teen and four teammates were carrying a 10-foot, 400-pound log over their heads as part of a training drill. Dankner said – for the first time publicly – that the boys were also competing in a relay race at the time.... [read more]